Official Gazette of 04 July 2025
Find out what new regulation was published on 04 July 2025 and how that aligns or misaligns with what the parties have promised before the elections!
Consult the full version of today's offical gazette here. Note that this blog post is not written by a human. It was generated by Artificial Intelligence. Read more about what this blog is here.
Summary of Regulatory Changes in the Belgian Official Gazette – July 4, 2025
Key Regulatory Changes
1. New Specific Issuance Rules for the "Million" Lottery
On June 19, 2025, a royal decree was published outlining the specific issuance rules for the public lottery known as "Million," organized by the National Lottery. This decree sets forth the regulations governing ticket sales, prize distributions, and the operational conduct of the lottery.
Example of Change: Before this decree, the lottery's operational guidelines may have been less specified. With the new rules in place, participants can expect clearer guidelines regarding how tickets are sold and how winnings are distributed, thereby increasing transparency and accountability.
2. Mandatory Collective Labor Agreement for Sheltered Workplaces
A royal decree dated June 13, 2025, was issued declaring a collective labor agreement from March 19, 2025, as generally binding for the Flemish sector of sheltered workplaces (social workshops and "maatwerkbedrijven"). This agreement establishes the contribution percentages for the year 2025 to the 社会fonds 327.01 for financing the second pension pillar.
Example of Change: Organizations operating in this sector are now obligated to adhere to specific financial contributions that ensure sustainable pension funding for employees within these sheltered workplaces, effectively impacting the financial planning of these organizations.
3. Modification of Prison Administration Regulations
A royal decree from June 18, 2025, modifies the previous royal decree from August 17, 2019, implementing provisions from the foundational law dated January 12, 2005, concerning the prison system and the rights of detainees. This modification addresses the allocation of prison facilities and the placement and transfer of prisoners.
Example of Change: The revised regulations may affect where certain categories of detainees are held within the prison system, potentially leading to changes in the types of facilities used or the conditions under which different groups are managed.
Conclusion
These regulatory changes reflect active governance aimed at enhancing transparency in public lotteries, promoting labor rights in sheltered workplaces, and refining the management of the prison system. Each of these changes introduces new obligations and frameworks that impact both organizations and individuals, fostering a more structured legal environment in Belgium.
Analysis
Note that the AI that generated below text was prompted to be critical and foucs on inconsistencies between new regulations and party promises. Always good to be critical towards the government!
Critical Analysis of Inconsistencies in Party Promises and Recent Regulatory Changes
N-VA (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie): N-VA has consistently focused on creating a transparent and efficient public sector, including oversight of public gambling. The new issuance rules for the "Million" lottery align with their commitment to improving transparency and accountability. However, if these rules lead to increased operational costs for the lottery that might translate into reduced funding for public initiatives, it could contradict N-VA’s emphasis on effective public spending. Additionally, their support for labor rights in sheltered workplaces is commendable, but the new financial contributions required could strain the budgets of these organizations, potentially leading to unintended job reductions or program cutbacks.
MR (Mouvement Réformateur): MR champions minimal regulation and a competitive environment for businesses. While they may support the intention behind increasing transparency in lottery operations, they might see the new regulations as a source of unnecessary complexity that could complicate operational frameworks. The mandatory collective labor agreement for sheltered workplaces may also introduce increased costs for employers, which could conflict with MR's pledge to promote a business-friendly atmosphere. They need to ensure that while encouraging fair labor practices, the administrative requirements do not impede the flexibility that businesses need to thrive.
CD&V (Christen-Democratisch en Vlaams): CD&V focuses on social welfare, particularly regarding labor rights and community support. They would likely welcome the binding agreement for sheltered workplaces, seeing it as an opportunity to enhance pensions and working conditions for vulnerable workers. However, if the financial pressures on organizations to meet these new contribution levels lead to reduced services or layoffs, it could conflict with their promise to protect the welfare of aided communities. The changes to prison administration regulations, while aiming for enhanced management, must ensure they do not sacrifice the rights of detainees, which is a core concern for CD&V's community-focused platform.
Vooruit: Vooruit has a strong advocacy for worker rights and social equity. The mandatory collective labor agreement for sheltered workplaces fits well with their agenda to improve labor conditions, ensuring better pension security for workers in vulnerable positions. However, they must be cautious that increased financial burdens on these employers do not lead to job losses or reduced capacity to care for clients. The emphasis on the new rules regarding prison administration reflects their commitment to fair treatment within the justice system, but they should ensure these operational changes do not compromise the rights and rehabilitation of detainees.
Les Engagés: Les Engagés advocate for sustainable practices and equitable access to services. The approval of the new lottery issuance rules demonstrates their commitment to transparency and accountability in public fiances. However, if the operational guidelines complicate participation or lead to decreased funding for community-centric projects due to increased regulatory burdens on the lottery, it could contradict their dedication to inclusive economic practices. The changes to labor regulations and financial contributions for sheltered workplaces align with their values; however, they must ensure that these requirements are implemented fairly and do not inadvertently disadvantage small businesses or marginalized workers.
Conclusion
The regulatory changes in the Belgian Official Gazette reflect meaningful steps toward enhancing accountability, worker rights, and community welfare. While many updates align with party commitments aimed at improving labor conditions and transparency, inconsistencies arise, particularly concerning the implications for economic viability and operational flexibility for businesses. Each political party must navigate these challenges to ensure they effectively uphold their commitments while adapting to the evolving regulatory landscape.