Official Gazette of 15 July 2025
Find out what new regulation was published on 15 July 2025 and how that aligns or misaligns with what the parties have promised before the elections!
Consult the full version of today's offical gazette here. Note that this blog post is not written by a human. It was generated by Artificial Intelligence. Read more about what this blog is here.
Overview of Recent Regulatory Changes in Belgium (July 15, 2025)
This blog post summarizes key regulatory changes published in the Belgian Official Gazette on July 15, 2025, including significant amendments to electoral law, petition procedures, and provisions regarding expatriate spouses of officials.
1. Changes to the Electoral Law
Law amending the Electoral Code
On June 10, 2025, a new law was enacted to amend the table referenced in Article 87 of the Electoral Code. This change specifically modifies the composition of certain electoral districts in the Walloon and Flemish regions.
- Example of Change: The "Luxembourg electoral district" now has a revised composition according to the new provisions, which could affect how representatives are elected from this district.
The changes are set to take effect on December 2, 2024, and January 1, 2025, for specific districts.
2. Amendments to Petition Collection Procedures
Law amending the Petition Law
A law adopted on July 2, 2025, revises the previous petition law from May 2, 2019. The major change is the introduction of a maximum deadline for gathering signatures for petitions submitted to the Chamber of Representatives: - If signatures are collected electronically, the deadline is limited to two years from the publication date on the House’s petition platform. - For those utilizing both paper and electronic signatures, paper signatures must be submitted the day after the electronic collection period ends.
This law also specifies the retention period for the personal data of petitioners.
Impact Example
This change means that an online petition needs to be promoted more aggressively within two years to ensure it meets the new deadline, as opposed to the previous indefinite duration.
3. Introduction of Residency Attestation for Spouses of Officials
Royal Decree on Residency Attestation
On May 12, 2025, a royal decree was issued to establish a residency attestation for spouses of foreign career or consular officials, as well as representatives of communities and regions.
- Example of Application: If the spouse of a Belgian diplomat is residing abroad, this new attestation serves to legitimize their residency status connected to the diplomat’s official function, easing administrative burdens.
Effective Date
The regulation will be effective starting January 1, 2025.
Conclusion
These updates reflect Belgium's ongoing efforts to modernize electoral procedures, streamline petition collection processes, and support Belgian officials' families living abroad. Each change will likely have a significant impact on residents and representatives in terms of electoral representation and administrative efficiency. It is advisable for individuals and entities affected by these laws to review their operations and ensure compliance with the new regulations.
Analysis
Note that the AI that generated below text was prompted to be critical and foucs on inconsistencies between new regulations and party promises. Always good to be critical towards the government!
Critical Analysis of Inconsistencies in Party Promises and Recent Regulatory Changes
N-VA (Nieuw-Vlaamse Alliantie): N-VA places a strong emphasis on local governance and electoral integrity. The changes to the electoral law, which modify the composition of electoral districts, are consistent with their commitment to ensuring fair representation. However, if these changes lead to the dilution of local voices or minimize the influence of specific communities within the electoral process, it could undermine their promise to empower local governance. Additionally, while they support the residency attestation for spouses of officials as a means to streamline administration, they should ensure that these reforms do not favor certain groups over local residents who may also require assistance in navigating bureaucratic processes.
MR (Mouvement Réformateur): MR advocates for efficiency and reduced bureaucratic constraints in governance. The introduction of a maximum deadline for gathering signatures for petitions aims to streamline the petition process, which aligns with their focus on encouraging citizen participation in governance. However, the need for aggressive promotion within two years to meet the new deadline may place an undue burden on citizen initiatives, potentially contradicting MR’s promise to foster individual engagement without excessive governmental hurdles. If the new petition regulations lead to fewer successful initiatives due to tighter timelines, it may impact their goal of promoting democratic participation.
CD&V (Christen-Democratisch en Vlaams): CD&V emphasizes the importance of public involvement and social equity. The amendments to the petition law focusing on a clear timeline for signature collection align well with their goals of encouraging civic engagement. However, the limitation might discourage individuals or groups with fewer resources from organizing successful petitions, impacting equitable representation. Furthermore, while the new residency attestation for spouses of officials promotes efficiency, they must consider whether it adequately addresses the needs of locals facing bureaucratic hurdles themselves, thereby ensuring it does not contradict their commitment to community welfare.
Vooruit: Vooruit focuses on equity and the empowerment of marginalized voices within the political landscape. The changes to the electoral law aim to ensure fair representation, which is consistent with their advocacy. However, they must be cautious about how the adjustments to electoral districts influence the power dynamics within local communities. If the changes result in disenfranchisement of specific groups, it could contradict their promise of promoting equity in representation. The new regulations on petitions could also lead to less participation if the timelines are perceived as too restrictive or demanding, especially for those from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Les Engagés: Les Engagés promote inclusivity and social equity in governance. The adjustments to electoral procedures and the residency attestation align with their commitment to ensuring that all citizens have equal access to governmental services. Nonetheless, they need to ensure that the petition regulations do not create barriers that deter participation from diverse communities, particularly those that may not be as well organized. The emphasis on deadlines could disproportionately affect those without the means to campaign actively for their causes, potentially undermining their goals of fostering an inclusive political environment.
Conclusion
The recent regulatory changes highlighted in the Belgian Official Gazette reflect crucial advancements in electoral procedures, social equity, and bureaucratic efficiency. However, inconsistencies arise as these changes may impact voter representation, citizen engagement, and equitable access to public services. Each political party must navigate these complexities carefully to ensure they fulfill their commitments to their constituents in the context of these evolving regulations.